It is wiser to be mindful of the weight and impact of a catch, than to break the net and lose all hope. We ask ourselves at the outset of any Pacific evaluation/research questions such as those posed by Tui Atua Tupua Tamasese (2005).* "Who will benefit from this production of knowledge? Research and evaluation is not exempt from the structures and from the ideologies of the Dominant culture. What steps can be taken by evaluators to ensure that the knowledges they produce do not further marginalise Pacific people?" [*] Tamasese, T. K. (2005). Pacific Governance. Paper presented at the Pacific Health Research Fono, Auckland.

We have different methods, but the foundation remains the same. We gather and interweave different perspectives throughout the life of our evaluation within the analysis, interpretation and reporting phases of the evaluation – all of which will be contextualised within Pacific understandings, knowledge and ways of doing/being. We embrace diverse Pacific cultures and contexts and acknowledge there are similarities and differences in ethnic specific and historical reference points. We are committed to providing opportunities for discussion in safe spaces for different groups of participants.

Nurturing relationships as a collective approach to research and evaluation We maintain respectful and meaningful relationships with all. We are committed to early engagement and building meaningful relationships with the PJSP in the planning interviews. The evaluation team will remain accessible to all stakeholders outside of data collection timeframes via zoom/teams or phone. Multiple communications and engagements provide opportunities to add new strands of knowledge and information from different stakeholder groups at different timepoints. We are respectful of Pacific cultural protocols and behaviours. We are committed to communicating in Pacific languages where possible, providing appropriate information to ensure participants can make informed decisions.

The cure for the toxic sting of one star fish is the star fish itself We take a strengths-based approach and work with our communities to identify and enhance solutions. Provide accessible reporting that speaks to the needs of different stakeholders. We have developed short reports that integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Positive feedback from our clients has reinforced the value of this reporting approach because it is engaging, and people read the reports.

We are doves from different parts of the forest but connected in one cause. We engage to listen and ensure our Pacific voices are represented. We put our clients and participants at the centre by considering the outcomes that are important to them. A holistic approach to measuring outcomes also places the client at the centre. Face-to-face engagement with clients helps to put them at the centre and build relationships.